| The Principle of the Derivation of Rights | |
| Contents | |
The Principle of the Derivation of Rights.
| Some logical rules to be born in mind in the derivation of rights |
|
| The distinction between simple and complex rights The first rule |
|
| The distinction between what is lawful and what is of right The second rule |
|
| The distinction between complete rights and rights relative to certain human beings The third rule |
|
| Other kinds of relative rights The fourth rule |
| The principle to be followed in the derivation and determination of rights |
|
| A false way of determining rights by means of the end to which they are ordered by nature |
|
| Ownership, as that which is proper to a person, is the general principle according which all rights are to be determined |
|
| Continuation Jural freedom |
|
| Continuation |
|
| Comparison of the principle proposed by us for the determination of rights with the principle of possible co-existence followed almost universally in Germany |
|
| The first deficiency in the principle which determines rights by means of the possibility of co-existence of persons: this principle does not necessarily include the characteristic of morality |
|
| The second deficiency: the principle would not be complete even if it included the characteristic of morality |
|
| The third deficiency: the principle can determine some rights, but not all |
|
| Fourth deficiency: the principle does not determine the quantity of limitation that each individual must impose on the exercise of his own activity |
| The principle determining the harm done to rights |
| Home |